Homography Matrix Validation: Is My Matrix Correct?

• Introduction
• Step-by-Step Guide
• Code Example
• Additional Notes
• Summary
• Conclusion
• References

Evaluating the quality of a computed homography matrix is crucial for ensuring accurate image alignment and perspective transformations. This process involves several steps to assess how well the homography maps points between images.

1. Reproject points: Use the homography matrix to reproject the points from the source image to the destination image.

dst_pts = cv2.perspectiveTransform(src_pts, H)

2. Calculate distances: Measure the distances between the reprojected points and the corresponding points in the destination image.

distances = np.linalg.norm(dst_pts - dst_pts_ground_truth, axis=1)

3. Evaluate distances: If the distances are small, the homography is likely good. You can set a threshold for the maximum allowable distance.

good_matches = distances < threshold

4. Singular Value Decomposition (SVD): Compute the SVD of the homography matrix.

U, S, V = np.linalg.svd(H)

5. Ratio of singular values: Verify the ratio of the largest to the smallest singular value. A large ratio indicates a poorly conditioned matrix, suggesting a problematic homography.

ratio = S[0] / S[2]

6. Visual inspection: Visualize the reprojected points on the destination image to qualitatively assess the homography's accuracy.

img = cv2.drawMatches(img1, kp1, img2, kp2, good_matches, None)
cv2.imshow("Matches", img)
cv2.waitKey(0)

Remember that these are just guidelines, and the specific criteria for a "good" homography may vary depending on the application.

This Python code evaluates the accuracy of a homography matrix calculated from matched keypoints between two images. It uses reprojection error and singular value decomposition to assess the quality of the homography, and visualizes the matches for inspection.

import cv2
import numpy as np

# Load the images
img1 = cv2.imread('image1.jpg')
img2 = cv2.imread('image2.jpg')

# Find the keypoints and descriptors using your preferred method (e.g., SIFT, ORB)
# ...

# Match the descriptors
# ...

# Extract the matched keypoints
src_pts = np.float32([kp1[m.queryIdx].pt for m in good_matches]).reshape(-1, 1, 2)
dst_pts_ground_truth = np.float32([kp2[m.trainIdx].pt for m in good_matches]).reshape(-1, 1, 2)

# Estimate the homography matrix
H, _ = cv2.findHomography(src_pts, dst_pts_ground_truth, cv2.RANSAC, 5.0)

# --- Evaluate the homography ---

# 1. Reproject points
dst_pts = cv2.perspectiveTransform(src_pts, H)

# 2. Calculate distances
distances = np.linalg.norm(dst_pts - dst_pts_ground_truth, axis=1)

# 3. Evaluate distances
threshold = 5.0  # Set a threshold for the maximum allowable distance
good_matches = distances < threshold

# 4. Singular Value Decomposition (SVD)
U, S, V = np.linalg.svd(H)

# 5. Ratio of singular values
ratio = S[0] / S[2]

print(f"Number of good matches: {len(good_matches)}")
print(f"Ratio of singular values: {ratio}")

# 6. Visual inspection
img = cv2.drawMatches(img1, kp1, img2, kp2, good_matches, None)
cv2.imshow("Matches", img)
cv2.waitKey(0)

Explanation:

1. Load images and find matches: This part is assumed to be done already. You need to have two images and a set of matched keypoints between them.
2. Estimate homography: cv2.findHomography calculates the homography matrix H using the matched keypoints. RANSAC is used for robustness.
3. Reproject points: The found homography is used to transform the points from the first image to the second image's coordinate system.
4. Calculate and evaluate distances: The Euclidean distances between the reprojected points (dst_pts) and the actual corresponding points (dst_pts_ground_truth) are calculated. If the distances are below a threshold, the matches are considered good.
5. Singular Value Decomposition: SVD is performed on the homography matrix. The ratio of the largest to the smallest singular value (S[0] / S[2]) indicates the matrix's condition. A high ratio suggests a poorly conditioned matrix, potentially leading to inaccurate transformations.
6. Visual inspection: Finally, the matches are visualized by drawing lines between corresponding points. This allows for a qualitative assessment of the homography's accuracy.

Remember:

• This code provides a basic framework. You'll need to fill in the parts for feature detection, description, and matching based on your chosen algorithms.
• Adjust the threshold and interpret the ratio based on your specific application and desired accuracy.
• Visual inspection is crucial to confirm if the homography aligns the images as expected.

General Considerations:

• Application-specific criteria: The definition of a "good" homography depends heavily on the application. For example, image stitching might tolerate smaller errors than precise object recognition.
• Ground truth availability: The code assumes you have ground truth correspondences (dst_pts_ground_truth). In real-world scenarios, this might not be available, requiring alternative evaluation methods.
• Computational cost: SVD and reprojection calculations add computational overhead. Consider the trade-off between accuracy and speed for your application.

Improving Robustness:

• Outlier rejection: RANSAC in cv2.findHomography helps, but additional outlier filtering based on reprojection errors can further improve accuracy.
• Normalization: Normalizing keypoint coordinates before homography estimation can improve numerical stability, especially with large images or significant perspective changes.
• Confidence measures: Instead of a hard threshold, use the distances to calculate a confidence score for each match, allowing for more nuanced decision-making.

Alternative Evaluation Metrics:

• Geometric error: Instead of Euclidean distance, use geometrically meaningful metrics like symmetric transfer error or Sampson distance for more accurate evaluation.
• Image similarity: After warping one image using the homography, compare it to the other image using metrics like structural similarity index (SSIM) or peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR).

Beyond Numbers:

• Qualitative analysis: Visual inspection remains crucial. Examine the warped image for artifacts, misalignments, or distortions, especially at object boundaries and high-frequency regions.
• Domain knowledge: Incorporate domain-specific knowledge to refine the evaluation. For instance, if you know the scene should have parallel lines, check if the homography preserves this property.

Remember: Evaluating homographies is not a one-size-fits-all process. Choose the methods and criteria that best suit your specific application and data.

This article outlines methods for evaluating the accuracy of a computed homography matrix, which describes the transformation between two images.

Quantitative Evaluation:

1. Reprojection Error:

   • Reproject known points from the source image to the destination image using the homography matrix.
   • Calculate the distances between these reprojected points and their corresponding ground truth locations in the destination image.
   • Smaller distances indicate a more accurate homography. A threshold can be set to define acceptable error.

2. Singular Value Decomposition (SVD):

   • Decompose the homography matrix using SVD.
   • Analyze the ratio between the largest and smallest singular values.
   • A large ratio suggests a poorly conditioned matrix, indicating potential issues with the homography.

Qualitative Evaluation:

• Visual Inspection:
  • Overlay the reprojected points onto the destination image.
  • Visually assess the alignment between the reprojected points and their corresponding features in the destination image.
  • This provides a qualitative understanding of the homography's accuracy.

Important Note: The definition of a "good" homography is application-dependent. The chosen evaluation criteria and thresholds should reflect the specific requirements of the task.

By analyzing both quantitative measures like reprojection error and the ratio of singular values from SVD, alongside qualitative visual inspection of the reprojected points, we can effectively determine if a homography matrix is suitable for a given task. Remember that the specific criteria for a "good" homography will always depend on the application's requirements, and a nuanced approach considering both numerical indicators and visual assessment is key to achieving successful image alignment and perspective transformations.

• linear algebra - How to check if an image to image homography is ... | Mar 31, 2021 ... In the comments @BenGrossmann mentions condition number as a good way of evaluation how much a matrix "squishes" space. This is great, but it ...
• computer vision - Detecting garbage homographies from ... | Jun 10, 2012 ... Even better, compute its SVD, and verify that the ratio of the ... How to check if obtained homography matrix is good? 27 · How can you ...
• Detecting position and rotation of the openMV camera relative to a ... | Hi, if he gets it done over the weekend (unlikely but maybe) then you can try to use the code I originally posted from chatpgt. If homography support is ported too then it becomes super easy.
• opencv - How can you tell if a homography matrix is acceptable or ... | Jun 15, 2012 ... The best way to tell if the homography is acceptable is. 1- Take the points of one image and reproject them using the computed homography.
• Obtain motion between image features by means of the homography ... | Sep 20, 2015 ... ... know the FOV and image dimensions. If this is the case, you could get the camera matrix. Or even better, if you have your K matrix (you ...
• Help with homography transformation - OpenCV Q&A Forum | Jul 24, 2018 ... ... obtained with the homography matrix stored in H.txt . I'd assume that ... Check if homography is good · How findHomography works? Does ...
• corner pin adjustement of plane/quad with videotexture? - Jitter ... | Before I twist my brain yet another turn:

I am trying to achieve something which seems simple in environments like quartz composer/vdmx...

• How can I get an estimate of how good is the homography that I get ... | Apr 7, 2016 ... Check out the FAQ! ... No need to recalculate the homography (I understand calculate homography the process that allows to get the matrix H).
• Best practice for GPU -> CPU -> GPU computation - vision - PyTorch ... | Hi everyone, I’m currently working on a pipeline that involves using OpenCV between two GPU computations. However, I encountered two problems: OpenCV code runs on the CPU, which means that data must be transferred from the GPU to the CPU and back to the GPU again. The OpenCV function can only process one sample (from a batch) at a time, which slows down the computation. Here is an example of my code: # GPU computation x = ... # B, C, H, W # Pre-allocate memory outputs = torch.zeros(...