Async/Await Inside New Promise: Anti-Pattern?

• Introduction
• Step-by-Step Solution
• Code Example
• Additional Notes
• Beyond the Basics: Advanced Async Patterns
• Summary
• Alternatives
• Conclusion
• References

This article delves into a common JavaScript anti-pattern: using async/await within the Promise constructor. We'll explore why this practice is discouraged and present better alternatives for handling asynchronous operations effectively. The discussion will cover the redundancy and complexity introduced by this anti-pattern, along with the challenges it poses for error handling and code maintainability. We'll then introduce preferred approaches, such as using the Promise constructor with then and catch methods or employing async functions, highlighting their advantages in terms of clarity and error management. The article emphasizes key points to remember when working with asynchronous code, including proper error handling techniques and the importance of choosing the appropriate approach based on the specific use case. Additional considerations regarding async/await within the Singleton pattern and asynchronous initialization are also touched upon. By understanding this anti-pattern and adopting recommended alternatives, developers can write cleaner, more maintainable, and efficient asynchronous JavaScript code.

Several resources you've shared highlight a common anti-pattern in JavaScript: using async/await directly inside the new Promise() constructor. Let's break down why this is considered bad practice and explore better alternatives.

Why is it an Anti-Pattern?

1. Redundancy: The Promise constructor is already designed to handle asynchronous operations. Using async/await within it creates unnecessary nesting and complexity.

2. Error Handling Challenges: Handling errors within the nested async function can become cumbersome. The Promise constructor's built-in error handling mechanisms using resolve and reject are more straightforward.

3. Readability and Maintainability: The code becomes less readable and harder to maintain due to the nested structure.

Alternatives and Best Practices:

1. Promise with then and catch:

function fetchData() {
  return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
    // Perform asynchronous operation (e.g., fetch data)
    fetch('https://api.example.com/data')
      .then(response => response.json())
      .then(data => resolve(data))
      .catch(error => reject(error));
  });
}

fetchData()
  .then(data => {
    // Handle successful data retrieval
    console.log(data);
  })
  .catch(error => {
    // Handle errors
    console.error(error);
  });

2. Async Function:

async function fetchData() {
  try {
    const response = await fetch('https://api.example.com/data');
    const data = await response.json();
    return data;
  } catch (error) {
    console.error(error);
    throw error; // Re-throw to allow further error handling
  }
}

fetchData()
  .then(data => {
    console.log(data);
  })
  .catch(error => {
    console.error(error);
  });

Key Points:

• Use the Promise constructor with resolve and reject for basic asynchronous operations.
• For more complex scenarios or cleaner syntax, leverage async/await within an async function.
• Always handle errors appropriately using try/catch blocks or .catch() method.

Additional Considerations:

• The resources also touch upon using async/await within a Singleton pattern. While possible, ensure proper error handling and consider the implications of asynchronous initialization in a singleton context.
• Remember, choosing the right approach depends on the specific use case and complexity of your asynchronous operations.

By understanding the anti-pattern and applying the recommended alternatives, you can write cleaner, more maintainable, and efficient asynchronous JavaScript code.

This code demonstrates an anti-pattern of using async/await inside a Promise constructor, which is redundant and makes error handling complex. It then presents two best practices: using a Promise with then/catch for clear async flow and error handling, and using an async function with try/catch for cleaner syntax and error handling. The key takeaway is to choose the approach that best suits your needs while prioritizing readability and proper error handling.

Here's a breakdown of the anti-pattern and best practices with JavaScript examples:

Anti-Pattern: Async/Await within Promise Constructor

function fetchData() {
  return new Promise(async (resolve, reject) => {
    try {
      const response = await fetch('https://api.example.com/data');
      const data = await response.json();
      resolve(data);
    } catch (error) {
      reject(error);
    }
  });
}

Why it's bad:

• Redundant: The Promise constructor already handles async operations.
• Complex Error Handling: Nested try/catch within the constructor is cumbersome.
• Readability: The nested structure makes the code harder to read and maintain.

Best Practice 1: Promise with then and catch

function fetchData() {
  return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
    fetch('https://api.example.com/data')
      .then(response => response.json())
      .then(data => resolve(data))
      .catch(error => reject(error));
  });
}

fetchData()
  .then(data => console.log(data))
  .catch(error => console.error(error));

Explanation:

• Uses the Promise constructor with resolve and reject for clear async flow.
• Leverages then for successful data handling and catch for error handling.

Best Practice 2: Async Function

async function fetchData() {
  try {
    const response = await fetch('https://api.example.com/data');
    const data = await response.json();
    return data;
  } catch (error) {
    console.error(error);
    throw error; // Re-throw for further handling
  }
}

fetchData()
  .then(data => console.log(data))
  .catch(error => console.error(error));

Explanation:

• Uses async/await within an async function for cleaner syntax.
• Employs try/catch for error handling and re-throws errors for potential further handling.

Key Takeaways:

• Choose the approach that best suits your use case and complexity.
• Prioritize readability and maintainability.
• Always handle errors appropriately.

• Historical Context: This anti-pattern might have emerged due to developers transitioning from callback-based asynchronous patterns to promises and then to async/await. The initial unfamiliarity with promises could have led to using async/await within the Promise constructor out of habit.
• Performance Implications: While the performance difference is likely negligible in most cases, the unnecessary nesting and function calls introduced by the anti-pattern could, in theory, have a slight impact on performance, especially in performance-critical applications.
• Debugging Challenges: Debugging code with the anti-pattern can be more difficult due to the nested structure and potential confusion around error handling. Using clear and straightforward promise chains or async/await within async functions can make debugging easier.
• Educational Value: Understanding this anti-pattern serves as a valuable learning experience for developers, highlighting the importance of understanding the underlying mechanisms of promises and async/await and using them appropriately.
• Community Consensus: The strong consensus within the JavaScript community against this anti-pattern reinforces the importance of following best practices and writing clean, maintainable code.

• Promise.all() and Promise.race(): These methods are useful for handling multiple asynchronous operations concurrently. Promise.all() waits for all promises to resolve, while Promise.race() returns the result of the first promise that settles (either resolves or rejects).
• Error Handling with Promise Chains: Chaining .catch() methods allows for specific error handling at different stages of a promise chain. This can be helpful for handling different types of errors or performing specific actions based on the error.
• Async Generators and Iterators: These features enable asynchronous iteration and can be powerful tools for processing data streams or handling complex asynchronous workflows.
• Advanced Async Libraries: Libraries like Bluebird and Q provide additional functionality and utilities for working with promises, such as cancellation, progress tracking, and more.

By exploring these advanced patterns and libraries, developers can further enhance their asynchronous JavaScript skills and tackle more complex asynchronous challenges effectively.

In conclusion, understanding the anti-pattern of using async/await within the Promise constructor is crucial for writing clean, maintainable, and efficient asynchronous JavaScript code. While this approach might seem intuitive at first, it introduces redundancy, complexity, and challenges in error handling. By opting for recommended alternatives such as Promise chains with then/catch or async functions with try/catch, developers can achieve better code clarity, maintainability, and error management. Remember to choose the approach that best aligns with your specific use case and complexity requirements, always prioritizing readability and proper error handling. As you delve deeper into asynchronous JavaScript, explore advanced patterns like Promise.all(), Promise.race(), and async generators to tackle more complex asynchronous challenges effectively. By avoiding anti-patterns and embracing best practices, you'll be well-equipped to write robust and efficient asynchronous code in your JavaScript projects.

• javascript - Pass Async function to new Promise constructor - Code ... | Dec 22, 2017 ... I want to use Async/Await inside a Promise ... promise is a promise anti-pattern and should not be done. ... const processData = async function() { ...
• javascript - new Promise() vs (async () => {})() - Stack Overflow | Jul 27, 2019 ... In the second approach you can use try and catch blocks, like so: const promise = (async () => { try { await new Promise(resolve ...
• Using async/await inside a Javascript Promise | Medium | What is the correct way to use async/await inside a Javascript promise? This article shows you the correct way and it’s simple
• javascript - How can I use async/await in 'new Promise' block to fetch ... | Nov 7, 2020 ... ... new Promise' block which throws await is only valid in async ... Is it an anti-pattern to use async/await inside of a new Promise() constructor?
• Asynchronous processing (async/await) in a construct · Issue #8273 ... | ❓ General Issue The Question Is it possible to do asynchronous processing in a Construct? Is there anything in CDK that will wait for a promise to resolve? It seems that everything is synchronous. ...
• javascript - Is creating a new promise with a async function call bad ... | May 27, 2018 ... Is it an anti-pattern to use async/await inside of a new Promise() constructor? 6 · Defining async function inside promise · 0 · Is it good to ...
• Promises made a bit easier - Developers - Homey Community Forum | Promises made a bit easier I’ve noticed that some developers, especially the ones without an extensive Javascript (JS) background, can struggle a bit with understanding promises. I decided to do a write-up that explains what they are, how they work, how you can use them, and some pitfalls and tricks. What’s a promise? A promise represents the outcome of a certain asynchronous operation, even when that operation has not yet finished. It is quite literally a promise that once the operation is don...
• javascript - How to get around async promise executor - Stack ... | Sep 18, 2022 ... Is it an anti-pattern to use async/await inside of a new Promise() constructor? Related. 11871 · How can I remove a specific item from an array ...
• Singleton with async constructor in JavaScript | by Adam Brodziak ... | Singleton is really easy to write, but it’s not so simple, especially in multi-threading environments. Sure, JavaScript is single-threaded…